On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 22:33:11 -0800 Gadi Evron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I apologize if this somehow gets to the list twice, I accidentally > posted it here with the wrong email address: > > 2. A commercial company providing with liability (and responsibility) > for the software you use (in other words - tech support and someone > to blame). Can you explain what responsibility does m$ take for its crap? Just read the m$ EULA again before using the word "responsibility". (having the right to say "fsck bill" does not qualify as responsibility). > 3. No source (!!) available for people to examine, thus making it, to a > level, harder to locate security "holes" - for outsides in any case. > There are enough bugs in windoze, but haven't you heard the rumours that a lot of propriatary os code has leaked? georgi _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
