Gadi Evron wrote: > there is a lot to be said for: > 1. A serious (note serious) commercial company that has a crew working > on addressing security concerns, and updating the product. > 2. A commercial company providing with liability (and responsibility) > for the software you use (in other words - someone to blame).
Your clients' safety is your own safety, and nobody was ever fired for buying IBM either. But the accountability argument that goes with $BIG_CORPORATION's name doesn't have any value. The EULA on your products debunks the accountability myth. -- Luis Bruno C8-H10-N4-O2-CH3-CH2-OH UTM 29T 629481 E 4511776 N Alt: 576m _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
