On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 15:42:32 EST, gabriel rosenkoetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I might be scared if it seemed like they had any data useful data, but > since it's not clear exactly what data they'd have anyway (knowing > that my name exists doesn't take more than Google, and you can get > way more than that with whois(1)). Geezuz H. F**king.. An alledged infosec list, and nobody twigs to the fact that there are at least 4 sets of data: 1) The data that the website is going to show to Joe Random Tourist. 2) The data that the website is going to show to Joe Random Tourist with a Referer: pointing to slashdot.org 3) The data that the website is going to show to an authenticated user. 4) The data that the website is going to show to a hacker. These are probably all different, and we're only seeing reports for (1) and maybe (2).
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
