Lately the SNR wouldn't allow for minimal communications if this were any communications infrastructure.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of flatline Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 4:45 PM To: Gregory A. Gilliss; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Signal to Noise Ratio for February Gregory, What makes you think F-D's "signal" would consist solely of advisories? If you've read the list charter (http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html), you should know to not only filter on the word "advisory". Your method of generating a signal:noise relation seems far from correct. / flatline At 11:41 PM 24-03-2004, Gregory A. Gilliss wrote: >List: > >Just for fun I decided to calculate the S/N ratio of FD. I used the >data from February 2004 (the last full month available). Here's my >methodology (for those who can do better :-): [ snip ] _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
