I totally agree with you, and I find your message very polite where Mortis's message 
seems ridiculous to be on such a demanding tone
of voice while he is in no position to demand anything, legally or socially.

And then the statement about updating the list charter. Ludicrous!

If any user of this mailing list wants to have certain content filtered out, let this 
be virusses or support questions (bwhahaha)
then they should filter this out themselfs! And if they cannot do it they'd beter hope 
other people don't have the support questions
filtered out...


Regards



Sean Crawford wrote:

> ---------------->       Mortis
>
> As an observer lurking!.
> I would have to say that the people hosting this list owe us (the
> subscribers) nothing more than the fact that they host this list, I'm sure
> this alone brings it's share of flack and I thank them for the service and
> would suggest that any anger would be better directed at the offender,
> inform them and move on....thats what I would suggest, isn't the internet
> about sharing idea's and information??......this is a prime list and being
> un-moderated is one of it's attractions!.
> I sure if that was to happen, next would be huge threads on the software
> that should be used for moderation....which in a strange sort of way would
> be the very thing your complaining about......so leave well enough
> alone.....
> No more flame or the inane.
>
> my couple a cents worth........
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mortis
> Sent: Friday, 26 March 2004 11:44 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Full-Disclosure] People who ask support questions on FD
>
> > In future please do not use this list for
> > software support.
>
> Dear list owners,
>
> This is a public letter from me telling you what to do.  You
> must respond to me.
>
> Create a mail filter to remove these harmful messages from
> my inbox.  It is intolerable to spread software support
> questions on the list.  This is clearly against the charter.
> And dangerous to the internet at large.  Especially those of
> us using Outlook.
>
> I am not willing to perform this work myself.
>
> Oh, yeah, and you must add something about this to the
> charter.  Get with the program.  You guys are slacking.  You
> owe us better then this.
> --
> Mortis
> <worthlessTidBit>
> Outlook (2000sp3 9.0.0.6627) loses line feeds when it gets:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.411 (Entity 5.404)
>
> No one else seems to lose them.
> *yawn*  Wonder what else it does wrong?
> </worthlessTidBit>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
> ________ Information from NOD32 ________
> This message was checked by NOD32 Antivirus System for Linux Mail Server.
>   part000.txt - is OK
> http://www.nod32.com
>
> __________ NOD32 1.694 (20040326) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.nod32.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to