The reason the conversation was posted is because this is full disclosure where I assume at least the majority of people actually believe in full disclosure and people keeping vulnerabilities secret isn't exactly kosher. This in particular is what i'm refering to
[22:40] <BlackNet> how many do you have that's not released? [22:41] <spender> 2 for exec-shield [22:41] <spender> 3 for systrace [22:41] <spender> 1 for DTE [22:41] <spender> ~10 for LIDS [22:42] <BlackNet> that's alot [22:42] <spender> oh [22:42] <spender> 3 i think for linsec [22:43] <BlackNet> all of these are non-reported? [22:43] <spender> correct
So I ask grsecurity fans, why would you run the software of someone no better than the people trying to crack your machine? This is not responsible behaviour and shows a clear disregard for security and safety of others.
Joshua Brindle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The point of the previous post was to point out that people shouldn't believe anything posted until other people in the conversation agree that it happened and/or make a statement about it.
--> http://www.angelfire.com/electronic/bodhidharma/mu.html
Just to let everyone know I am awaiting these exploits to be released to the respected parties in due time or an apology for falsifying these claims.
Ed
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html