If I'm not mistaken, there have been just as many if not more bugs in mIRC than there have been in the unix ports (Xchat for instance). Correct me if I'm mistaken.
RLT -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of adam Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:37 PM To: Ron DuFresne Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] irc over ssl Just because they're using mIRC, doesn't mean that they aren't unix/cisco tech geeks. Ever consider that they might have run Windows on their workstations at work? And even so using the clients that have been ported to Windows might be an even worse idea because of bugs in the ported clients. It would generally be a good idea to think about what you're typing to thousands of people before you actually send it. dolt. and Thank You! >> >> Unfortunately because of mIrc's reputation, some high management decided to have >> use disuse it.... Great, especially since we are all Solaris or Cisco kids and >> nothing to do with Microsoft based half compliant IRC stuff. >> >> So if you can get the author or mIrc extradited to some secret jail under the >> Homeland Security policy, I wouldn't mind doing the beating up and medieval >> stuff. I have some nasty shielded SCSI cables I could use as a whip. >> >> PS: Just for the "mIrc colors" invention that man deserves the "hungry lion at >> the Colosseum" treatment. >> > > If you folks was using mirc, then yer not the unix/cisco tech weenies you think you are. For there are a number of unix based irc clients available that do not have as much bloat as mirc, which requires windows to run. Thanks, Ron DuFresne _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
