Maarten wrote: > I noticed that this list (-software) unlike many others does not add a > "Reply-To: field with the list address there. This makes replying a wee bit > more error-prone since a lot of MUA's will happily reply to the poster > instead of the list unless you manually cut&paste the right addresses. > > Is there a special reason this header isn't used ?
"-software"? I received this on full-disclosure. Which list would be put in the Reply-to header? See the articles "Reply-To Munging Considered Harmful" http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html "Reply-To Munging Considered Useful" http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml -Dan Veditz _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
