nick's useless babble is just about as bad as the useless emails hes crying about i second the motion for nick to stfu if he has nothing useful to say
-- - illwill http://illmob.org On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 19:32:25 -0400, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mr. Nick FitzGerald: > > --- quote --- > > > > > And yes, I deliberately chose to send this to the list as many others > > here have the same habit (though getting duplicates of non-pointless > > Email is generally nowhere near as annoying as getting two of GuidoZ' > > rubbish). > > > > > --- quote --- > > I like to be copied directly on threads. I have a MUA capable of > highlighting mail sent directly to me so I do not have to read through > hundreds of messages to find the topics I am clearly interested in, they > just appear at the top. I also have the ability to filter duplicates so > who cares? If you are that concerned about it please use an appropriate > header to indicate your desire instead of a reply-to. If you cannot > afford the few extra pence for some duplicates perhaps you should not be > online. > > You are too up tight. The guy was attempting to be helpful and you get > on him like he is some ignorant pest. He even used google which is a > great start at finding information and far more than people on this list > bother to do most of the time. > > What meaningful assistance or information did you provide beyond the > initial identification mail? Mmmmmkayyy STFU and enjoy the day please. > Your constant pissing and moaning is nothing but a nuisance and causes > some really intelligent people to never bother joining in on a chat or > providing potentially useful information for fear of dealing with a > shite like you. I have had my moments too but I hope they were never as > inconsiderate as you have been. > > I think you are being the pest, if you do not like the posts in an open > forum then read the headers of the _list_ copy of this mail you will > ultimately receive. There is even a moderated version of the list > available where your drivel is surely to get scrapped along with this > message. > > Extra bandwidth is intentional. > > Nick FitzGerald wrote: > > > GuidoZ wrote: > > > > <<blah, blah, blah>> > > > > Look idiot -- would you please stop CC'ing me these messages? > > > > If you are using such a shite MUA that your only option to > > automatically get it to reply to the list address is to use some poxy > > "reply all" function, please stop replying. If that is the case and > > you just _must_ reply (we're all still waiting anxiously to see a > > single sentence worth reading actually come from your keyboard) then > > please edit the address fields so that my direct address is NOT among > > them. Much as receiving your drivel through the list is a nuisance > > waste of bandwidth and time, receiving a second copy of it direct is > > outright annoying. > > > > This list is "self-" or "auto-" moderated, meaning that it > > automatically accepts message from subscribers' addresses. Thus, if > > you post from a subscribed address (as you clearly do) there is no need > > whatsoever to CC someone when _replying_ to their message as they are > > almost necessarily on the list. > > > > Please desist this stupid and annoying habit forthwith. > > > > And yes, I deliberately chose to send this to the list as many others > > here have the same habit (though getting duplicates of non-pointless > > Email is generally nowhere near as annoying as getting two of GuidoZ' > > rubbish). > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Nick FitzGerald > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
