In some mail from Matt, sie said: > > GuidoZ wrote: > > Interesting indeed. Although, I imagine this was a spam email, and I > > never believe (nor buy) anything from spam. I wondr how credible this > > really is. If there was such a way to do what they claim, don't you > > think it would have been big news? >One would think you wouldn't first > > hear about it through spam. > > > It is quite possible to hide processes, reg keys and files, and is often > done by various malware.
Are they capable of hiding from "ps" when using the posix shell from "Windows Services for Unix" ? Darren _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
