On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 11:43:22AM -0500, Ron DuFresne wrote: > Vincent, I think you lost track in your reply, he was not talking about > braondband cable access to the internet, he was talking about cable TV > services being stolen in this case, and the teft of the 'service'. ... > On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Vincent Archer wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 11:41:49AM -0700, Jesse Valentin wrote: > > > How about using a digital de-scrambler for cable service? You?re getting > > > something you?re not paying for? isn?t that stealing? True, its not a vital > > > service, but isn?t this still plain ?ol stealing? > >
The initial post was about de-cramblers, i.e. watching TV programs you haven't paid a subscription for. It's not stealing. The TV programs you "stole" are still there, and every single subscriber had access to them. Hence, no theft has occured. Fraud, however, has occured in that case. I know habit still puts theft to use where nothing is ever stolen. You still talk about "stealing secrets" in espionage, for example. Nothing is stolen in that case either. In general, you cannot steal, in the real sense of the word, information. But theft is much shorter and convey better the sense of badness than "illegal duplication and access". -- Vincent ARCHER [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel : +33 (0)1 40 07 47 14 Fax : +33 (0)1 40 07 47 27 Deny All - 5, rue Scribe - 75009 Paris - France www.denyall.com _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
