>Unfortunatly, ms group policy do not handle mac, solaris, linux, ...
>only ms toys can be configured using this. I also think it is somewhat
>new and will probably be old (why don't you use this miracle ms tool
>named: sorry, this falls under some nda) in a year or so.
It's not somewhat new - it's four years old, and the technology in use was in use in NT 4 systems. It's the standard method of configuring Windows clients that are members of an Active Directory - and will probably continue to be so. A year or so won't even see the release of Longhorn, so it certainly won't be "old".
>This mail doesn't mean firefox/mozilla is the greatest tool of the
>world. It lacks (or my knowledge is too limited) good ldap support (I
>tryed keeping my netscape config on my ldap directory, mozilla do not
>seems to have this feature).
So that's the answer to my question there: No.
>Other browsers&mail readers are using a
>dedicated central config server (I forgot the name) in order to make
>them more corporate aware.
People underestimate the importance of the browser being "corporate aware" - being able to centrally control and configure the browser is important.
Title: RE: [Full-Disclosure] IE is just as safe as FireFox
- RE: [Full-Disclosure] IE is just as safe as FireFox Stuart Fox \(DSL AK\)
- RE: [Full-Disclosure] IE is just as safe as Fir... joe
- RE: [Full-Disclosure] IE is just as safe as Fir... joe
- RE: [Full-Disclosure] IE is just as safe as Fir... joe
- RE: [Full-Disclosure] IE is just as safe as... Gary E. Miller
- RE: [Full-Disclosure] IE is just as saf... joe
- Re: [Full-Disclosure] IE is just as... Georgi Guninski
- RE: [Full-Disclosure] IE is ju... joe
- Re: [Full-Disclosure] IE i... Georgi Guninski
- Re: [Full-Disclosure] IE i... john morris