It's ironic to me (so ironic, in fact, that I enjoyed a hearty guffaw) that you sent this post to full-disclosure. A tighter grip indeed.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of n3td3v Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 9:54 AM To: Todd Towles; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: [Full-Disclosure] Shadowcrew Grand Jury Indictment On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:41:20 -0600, Todd Towles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, it is given that posting to FD does give a site exposure (good and > bad). But I wouldn't say that FD was the cause of it..it was the illegal > activity that was the cause of it. We all know SCC does some underground > stuff and they post here each time they move. So...I wouldn't blame the > FD list for anything. I wouldn't use the word blame? I think its a good thing if Full-Disclosure is helping to catch online criminals. I don't know if you like malicious hackers and other criminals, but yeah.... I dislike them. I would do anything in my power to stop online crime, from scriptkiddie stuff, to sex stuff,spam,scams, fraud, terrorism and back again. I have no space for anyone thinking they are elite and all the other hacker scene crap. Its time to clamp down on the BS thats on the net. If I was in gov, I would shut a site down that looks remotely hax0rish, even if they've done nothing wrong. All these crews and hacker groups, fk them all. The net needs zero tollerence with online crime. Govs should have the authority to close anything done because they feel like it, without needing to prove shit. I would even close IRC channels. Hackphreak on undernet looks harmless, but fk that. Close it anyway, its time to get a tighter grip on things. Thanks,n3td3v _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html