Paul Schmehl wrote on 11/19/2004 11:07:47 AM:
> --On Friday, November 19, 2004 12:12:10 AM +0000 Jason Coombs
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://www.computerworld.com/governmenttopics/government/policy/story/0,1
> > 0801,97614,00.html?nas=PM-97614
> >
> I wouldn't trust anything coming out of Bezerkley without confirmation from
> competent researchers elsewhere. Furthermore, their more esteemed
> colleagues at CalTech already disagree with them.
>
> <http://www.vote.caltech.edu/Reports/Florida_discrepancy3.pdf>
>
> Even *if* they are correct (which is at least debateable) the 130,000 vote
> discrepancy they argue for won't overcome Bush's lead of 380,000, so this
> is, at best, an academic exercise.
Paul, do you really feel that as long as the (potentially) fraudulent votes did not change the outcome (as far as we know...knowing absolutely nothing for certain at this point) it's perfectly ok that a method for fixing the e-votes exists and is in use...hypothetically? I'm just trying to understand where you are coming from on this...does it only stop becoming an acedemic excersize if the shoe is on the other foot?
| CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This is a transmission from Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. and may contain information which is confidential and proprietary. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, copying or distribution or use of the contents of this message is expressly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please destroy it and notify us immediately at 262-703-7000. CAUTION: Internet and e-mail communications are Kohl's property and Kohl's reserves the right to retrieve and read any message created, sent and received. Kohl's reserves the right to monitor messages by authorized Kohl's Associates at any time without any further consent. |
