/me shakes her head at Andrew Farmer. Okay, now it's just ridiculous to suggest that you wouldn't be able to implement a time limitation on something encrypted simply because "clocks can be changed".
What 'clocks' are talking about -- which are you basing it off of? What if you decided to code into the encryption the use of atomic clocks, and include more than one or two as a redundancy/security check? Someone's really going create a huge conspiracy to change a few of the world's atomic clocks drastically to be able to crack someone's encrypted data? :P -jax >To: "Gautam R. Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: Full-Disclosure Full-Disclosure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >From: Andrew Farmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Time Expiry Alogorithm?? >Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 10:28:20 -0800 Gautam R. Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was just wondering is there any encrytpion alogortim which expires > with time. > For example an email message maybe decrypted withing 48 hours of its > delivery otherwise it become usless or cant be decrypted with the > orignal key >>No. Think about it for a moment. >>(Clocks can be changed.) _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
