[flame response] firstly, n3td3v is only mad because i happened to ban him from #hackphreak ... which is incidentally the current home of former/current "members" of [where to begin?] rhino9, w00w00 ... and of course, people who're currently employed at CA/ISS/M$/FS/SIDC. the list goes on. are we script kiddies or do we maybe like to do more than talk about computers all day? you be the judge. anyway, that has nothing to do with this list or this discussion and im sure we'd all benefit from you, and morons like rap1st, keeping their mouths shut.[/flame response]
at any rate -- thank you Barry for providing some relevant information and a legitimate, civilized response. two things on the issue of servers: (1) bandwidth expense and (2) an anonymity sacrifice [on someones part] would have to occur/be incurred if they should be forced to setup their own servers. ironically, since [as you mention] their software has already been fitted to other mediums, there would be no incentive to setup said servers, unless of course there are people who don't have such "retro-fitted" software at their disposal who wish to cause problems, in which case any upgrade to IRC itself would eliminate the threat coming from people who are totally lame and have no resources ... would the difference be negligible? I'm not sure. but again, i don't care anymore ... no one is concerned ... the end. btw, i was referring to everyone who drives a car not driving a model-t ... im sure they'd have kept on doing it for the entire century had someone not come along and made them change. --vord #hackphreak/undernet On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 19:50:12 +0000, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > im a crybaby, waa waa. :o( _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
