Hello, Most of the URL's google finds are pointing to ip Adresses. The people seem to be to Lazy to set up a subdomain for their cam's because it will be a part of a frameset on their website And the url would not bee seen anyway. I just greped one example, the camera reached under axis_64ddf3.axiscam.net:7000/view/index.shtml?videos=one is acually bound into their website in the frameset found on http://www.calgaryflyingclub.com/frame_webcam_parkinglot.asp so google found it there. Those Axis cams are easy to find using allinurl on google because they have their webserver included and so their URL's are all the same.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 25. Februar 2005 10:28 An: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Betreff: Fw: [Full-Disclosure] Google Search and Gmail Correlation A little OT but I was pondering the other day about something. Remember the Axis network camera "inurl" search that exposed internet facing LAN cameras? Well I noticed that lots of those cameras are configured on high ports. 7000 for example. Now, I wondered how Google gets those cameras into its cache. Ok so there may be a web facing link _somewhere_ that references the URL... but when you search there are hundreds of these cameras in Google's cache. Now are Google going to tell us that they got there merely from web links? Is Google doing port scans when it finds an IP? Probably not.... So how about the Googlebar secretly updating Google's cache when we use these things? Just a ponder, please dont flame me if its been covered before, I havent got my flame-proof trousers on today! :) Cheers, Colin. "Ádám Szilveszter dr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To Sent by: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com full-disclosure-b cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] ys.com Subject Re: [Full-Disclosure] Google Search and Gmail Correlation 24/02/2005 12:12 ! Hello Cody, I think that what you are observing is this: the cookie you get when visiting your gmail account is valid for the whole google.com domain, and therefore will be transferred again when you do web searches as well. As you write, this is not a bug per se, the cookie mechanism is working as expected. It is also obvious that such an approach may raise privacy concerns. Now, *if* google wanted to mitigate this problem, it would be easy. They should migrate the gmail service web frontend to a subdomain (say: gmail.google.com) or even a whole new domain (gmail.com exists already but www.gmail.com merely redirects) and make the cookie only valid in that domain/subdomain. The questions is, do they want to do this? And yes, for now, if you are privacy conscious, delete the cookie before doing a Google search (or using any other Google service). Regards: Szilveszter Adam Budapest Hungary _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html **************************************************************************** ******* This e-mail is confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not the addressee or if you have received the e-mail in error, it may be unlawful for you to read, copy, distribute, disclose or otherwise use the information which it contains. Under these circumstances, please notify us immediately by returning this mail to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' and deleting this e-mail from your system. Any views expressed by an individual within this e-mail do not necessarily reflect the views of Cadbury Schweppes Plc or its subsidiaries. Cadbury Schweppes Plc will not be bound by any agreement entered into as a result of this email, unless its intention is clearly evidenced in the body of the email. Whilst we have taken reasonable steps to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from viruses, recipients are advised to subject this mail to their own virus checking, in keeping with good computing practice. Please note that email received by Cadbury Schweppes Plc or its subsidiaries may be monitored in accordance with the prevailing law in the United Kingdom. **************************************************************************** ******* _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html