Somebody looking to bite the hand the fed them?
At 05:29 AM 3/1/2005 GMT, Jason Coombs wrote: >Regarding PivX Solutions: > >I would like to make contact with anyone who has been harmed by PivX Solutions. > >If you have been harmed by PivX Solutions, please contact me as soon as >possible. > >Thanks. > >Jason Coombs >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >_______________________________________________ >Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > but looking back a bit we see (check out the "from"): > To: "Hugo van der Kooij" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Advisory: Design flaw in human communication > FROM: "Jason Coombs PivX Solutions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:10:20 +0000 GMT > > Hugo van der Kooij wrote: > >I would like to point out a design > >flaw in human communication. > > What you describe is an implementation bug, not a design flaw. > > FD'ers in particular also appear to have a Reply To All defect whereby every > thought that enters one's head while reading FD is compulsively sent to the > entire list rather than to the individuals who may find the thoughts > interesting and relevant, despite those thoughts being off-topic. > > OT posts would be valuable to the tone and context of any list provided that > we could patch every mail client to remove the Reply To All feature. > > Shall we leave FD unmoderated with respect to any post that does not have > 'Re:' as the first three letters of its Subject line, but moderate all > replies? > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
