On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:29 PM, John Young <j...@pipeline.com> wrote: > Would you suggest it is time to license security professionals like > architects, engineers, doctors and others lawfully empowered to > police hazardous systems in the public interest?
the industry itself is the problem; no more security differentiation and specialization! "security" merely the cost of doing business, built-in and expected, lest actionable negligence occur. > A code of security industry standards, like building and health > codes, might then be needed to assure compliance this is the absolute opposite of a secure product or service life cycle; an abomination and farce. (also lucrative business!) > Disastrous security failures might then lead to prosecution for > malpractice, loss of license, jail, fines and banning to philosophizing an entirely a wonderful idea and completely unrelated to specialized security licensure absurditum. > Btw, is "security architect" a legal use of the term architect? planning a career move, John? i see where this is going... ;) _______________________________________________ Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
