> OK, I admit it, I don't understand the concept of non-protected > low-class speech. As I read the decision in 'People vs. Larry > Flynt', the US Supreme Court doesn't recognize such a beast either, > so I'm in good company...
Um, the SCOTUS decision says no such thing exists in the USA (or, let us be precise, existed at the time). This is a very different thing from not understanding the concept; if they didn't understand the concept they couldn't have said anything coherent about it at all. /~\ The ASCII der Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML [EMAIL PROTECTED] / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
