On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Alex Eckelberry wrote:
Some might get it, like WebWasher, which is a gateway-only scanner.
But I thought I made that clear in the blog post that it's not
surprising that there's zero detection.
I disagree. Even if it was for a martian computer and useless, AVs will
detect it for the sake of detecting it. Them not doing so is just another
example of how useless the AV *itself* is unfortunately becoming--more and
more.
This means one thing: Apple's day has finally come and Apple users are
going to get hit hard. All those unpatched vulnerabilities from years past
are going to bite them in the behind.
I can sum it up in one sentence: OS X is the new Windows 98. Investing in
security ONLY as a last resort losses money, but everyone has to learn it
for themselves.
Alex
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Dude VanWinkle
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 6:30 PM
To: Gadi Evron
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [funsec] mac trojan in-the-wild
On 10/31/07, Gadi Evron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://sunbeltblog.blogspot.com/2007/10/screenshot-of-new-mac-trojan.h
tml
Not surprisingly (it is, after all, a Mac virus), VirusTotal has zero
detection on this
err doesn't virustotal only detect windows viruses?
They dont have virex listed in the scanners, but ClamAV could be the BSD
version.. I guess
-JP
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
