On Dec 5, 2007 2:36 PM, Brian Loe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 5, 2007 1:12 PM, Dude VanWinkle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Seems odd, but I'm not sure I understand the point. Who cares? Might > > > they be security guards at various office buildings? Would make > > > sense... > > > > > > It would make sense to me if the Dept of Homeland Security had more > > guns than the National Marine Fisheries Service :-) > > > > National Marine Fisheries Service 141 > > Department of Homeland Security (IG) 132 > > Not to me. I'm not sure why the DHS would need ANY guns beyond their > security guards, in fact. They don't enforce any laws - they simply > play mother to the other cop agencies. > > The fisheries service, on the other hand, actually has protective > duties - not unlike the forestry service. > > Another misunderstanding: IRS guns. The government, these days, is > mostly there to take your money, OF COURSE they have lots of guns. > And, lets not forget, the ATF is under the Department of Revenue - as > well it should be, being a TAXing organization! DEA? I don't know > where they are, exactly, but they too SHOULD be under the DoR - that's > their role as well.
OK, I will re-send to the list as well: -------------------------------------- Jeez, do you ever laugh? humor I guess I have to start clearly labeling my humor and will do so in further emails <--Humor /humor Or am I just not very funny... hmm guess its the latter -JP _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
