While you are all wondering how to fix the technical issues of such a ban, I'm wondering more about the philosophical implications. Does Britain plan to be regulating human nature? If not, there will be no end to such bans.
On Dec 14, 2007 4:01 AM, Julio Canto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter Evans escribió: > > Brian Loe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >> As sent from another list member: > >> We predicted it... > >> Now it samuai swords. > >> http://www.news24.com/News24/World/News/0,,2-10-1462_2237699,00.html > > > > Cheap + Genuine are in this case mutually exclusive. > > > > It seems that this one bans the cheap ones and allows the genuine > > ones. How are they going to tell the difference? > > > > (yes, the professionals can, but they going to train customs need > > exercise?) > > > > > > Next up, they will be banning cheap kitchen knives ... > > Banning Katanas individually sounds like a not very smart move. There's > _plenty_ of 'hand-to-hand' weapons. Will they go next for no-dachis, > claymores, etc. individually? Is there not laws like controlling weapons > with one or other characteristic? (lenght of blade or whatever) > > -- > Regards, > > Julio Canto | VirusTotal.com | Hispasec Sistemas Lab | Tlf: > +34.902.161.025 | Fax: +34.952.028.694 | PGP Key ID: EF618D2B | > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. > _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
