On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 09:41:20AM -0500, John C. A. Bambenek, GCIH, CISSP wrote: > See, now this is actually censorship.
No, it's not. It's odious, stupid, and pointless, but it's not censorship because NetSol is a corporation, not a government. Their customers have freely chosen to enter into contracts stipulating whatever one-sided terms-of-service NetSol has this week and to thereby subject themselves to the inconsistent, bungled enforcement of same. (I'm sure NetSol's landsharks have already made certain that this action is consistent with those contractual provisions. IANAL, but the excerpts I've seen boil down to "we can do whatever we want whenever we want and no, we don't have to inform you or explain it to you or give you your money back.") Astute followup traffic on IP suggests that NetSol has more of a problem with websites about movies than with websites that actually advocate killing people. I'll suggest that anyone using NetSol for domain registration, DNS, or hosting is clueless. ---Rsk _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
