What I don't get is the upside to bottom posting. Richard
P.S. Another great controversy: What side to butter the bread on. ;-) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 2:42 PM To: 'funsec' Subject: Re: [funsec] Where does the Republican Party stand on the 1st Amendment? Different people read things differently. Some clients can be configured to default to top or bottom. It is an old argument. Older than Windows vs Linux and HTML vs Plain Text. I often do not read replies that I have to look for, so no apology needed for top posting here. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard M. Smith Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 10:59 AM To: 'funsec' Subject: Re: [funsec] Where does the Republican Party stand on the 1st Amendment? What's wrong with top posting? The most important stuff comes first and there is nothing to scroll through to get to it. Newspaper articles use the same technique. Richard -----Original Message----- From: Rob Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 5:35 PM To: Richard M. Smith Cc: funsec Subject: Re: [funsec] Where does the Republican Party stand on the 1st Amendment? Sorry for top posting, but to answer the question: "Where does the Republican Party stand on the 1st Amendment?" Right on top of it, with dog - crap covered shoes... Not that the Demo's are any better... On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Richard M. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/07/gop-threatening.html > > GOP Threatens CafePress Over Shirts, Stickers and Logos > > The Republican National Committee is threatening to sue CafePress for > hosting an online venue for vendors to hawk GOP-related regalia like > T-shirts, stickers and portrayals of elephants. > > The committee, as it turns out, owns the trademarks to "GOP," "Grand > Old Party," "Republican National Committee," "RNC" and the official > GOP elephant logo. > > Sean Cairncross, the party's chief counsel, wrote (.pdf) the Foster > City, California online vendor that the GOP "takes infringements upon > its trademarks seriously." > > "Please cease and desist from allowing vendors to utilize the > federally registered trademarks of the RNC or we will be forced to > consider a legal remedy," Cairncross wrote CafePress. > > ... > > > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. > -- Rob _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
