On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:28:50 PDT, "Paul M. Moriarty" said: > I'm not going on a trip to Corner Case Land with you. Send me a post > card.
It's hardly a "corner case". If somebody is following 11 people, and is being followed by somebody who only follows 6 people, how much of a snob are they, really? And is it realistic that if they're followed by 1K people, that they're supposed to follow hundreds/thousands themselves to eliminate any "snobbery" taint? Let's say I join Twitter, and I start following 10 people that I actually give a flying f**k in a rolling donut what they twitter. Nobody is following me. Am I a twitsnob? What if those 10 people start following me, even when I've done nothing different? What if 100 other people start following me? At what point is it "snobbery" rather than just "I have no frikking *clue* who you are or why I should follow you"? You're the one who used the apparently-derogatory term "twitsnob". You don't like the term being held up for examination, don't use it.
pgpY1RQnPdA6U.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
