About a week ago Gadi to me to Gadi:

> >> You haven't been on twitter, have you?
> >
> > I've never seen anything useful/interesting that I didn't get through
> > other media.
> >
> > I _have to_ read those other sources, so why waste the extra time getting
> > nothing additional at a very low signal-to-noise ratio???
> 
> Because you are making claims factually not true about how things work, 
> and what you seek is answered as a solution by twitter.

In fact, I think the only "factual" things I said about Twitter were true 
(140+ char URL issues).

I did also offer a few _opinions_ about why Twitter seems, _to me_, to be 
a solution looking for a problem (and why I expect it won't last in its 
current form/popularity).

Anyway, while reading the following (actually, one of the comments about 
"too much sharing"):

http://blogs.eweek.com/careers/content001/big_brother/how_not_to_get_a_job
_via_twitter.html


...I realized another thing I really dislike about Twitter _and_ that I 
suspect is a major part of its attraction for a certain (rather large) 
portion of its users, and it really is about "shouting into the 
darkness".  I believe that a lot of Twitter's (sub-conscious) attraction 
to a lot of its users (not all) is that it caters perfectly to the 
personality type that conspicuously and VERY LOUDLY shout into their cell 
phones in public places.  _They_ are unawre of this, just as they are 
unaware that they are shouting into their cell phones.  Commensurately, 
their opinions of "why Twitter is good [etc]" are largely irrelevant to 
any useful dialogue about the usefulness or not, desirability or not, 
etc, etc of Twitter.

But if calling me curmudgeon because I don't mind pointing out offenses 
to my sensibilities makes you feel better, by all means just label me 
thus and move along...


BTW -- you and others in this thread should look up the meaning of 
curmudgeon before brandishing it so freely.  Just because someone (older 
than you) says "that's not a good thing/idea because [something I know 
from the past]" does not make them a curmudgeon.  If that were true there 
would be no value whatsoever in anyone ever learning or remembering 
anything.  The US has just had eight years of an administration led by a 
group who seem to believe that, and I think most of us learnt something 
valuable from that...   8-)


Regards,

Nick FitzGerald


_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

Reply via email to