+1 Would you resend this peace on a regular basis.
-rick valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:51:10 PDT, ch...@blask.org said: >> -- On Mon, 10/19/09, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu <valdis.kletni...@vt.edu> wrote: >> >>> Oddly enough, for an "intractable" problem, most sites are >>> managing to deliver a reasonably acceptable user experience. >> By the definition "not easily relieved or cured" it remains intractable for >> providers, though most users can mostly ignore it today. For those who need >> to/ >> choose to try to actually *solve* the problem (iow - eliminate spam at the >> root) > > Anybody who thinks they can "*solve* the problem" is taking some really good > pharmaceuticals. I don't think there's a single police department out there > that seriously think they will "solve crime and elimitate it at the root". > > So if police departments with thousands(*) of years of experience aren't able > to eliminate meatspace crime, why do you think there's any realistic chance > of of doing so with the cyberspace spam criminals? > > (*) Yes, thousands - I'm sure there's been a city guard to deal with > pickpockets and the drunks coming out of taverns almost as long as there have > been pockets for pilfering and taverns for the drunks to come out of... So > back around Hammurabi or so... > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
