Ya if someone were to publicize funsec, what the hell would larry have left for his column?
Sorry but this material has already been commercialized please find other. On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Larry Seltzer <la...@larryseltzer.com>wrote: > Chill Barry. > > Everyone back to work. Nothing to see here. > > Larry Seltzer > Contributing Editor, PC Magazine > larry_selt...@ziffdavis.com > http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/ > > > -----Original Message----- > From: funsec-boun...@linuxbox.org [mailto:funsec-boun...@linuxbox.org] > On Behalf Of Barry Raveendran Greene > Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 2:53 PM > To: funsec@linuxbox.org > Subject: [funsec] Rethinking FUNSEC > > Hi Team, > > IMHO, the garbage in the press are influencing policy makers in > governments > and corporations to the wrong conclusions. Conclusions which lead to > actions > which is not addressing the reality of the threats. This is now not > something to be laughed at, but something which is hurting the industry. > > I'm already started to tear into articles which as flawed, not > researched, > and garbage. I will continue to do that. > > But we have another option - take the FUNSEC dialog public. This is not > opening the list, this is taking these conversations - which deal with > critiquing press articles - public and searchable. > > Thoughts? > > Barry > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. > > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. >
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
