On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:24:53 CST, RandallM said: > when will this be recognized as such?
Formal declarations of war are *soooo* 20th Century. Mostly because it's pretty damned obvious that there's a war on when 3 divisions of infantry and a division of heavy armored roll across the border. And if there *aren't* a few divisions crossing the border, a "Declaration of War" is only a "Declaration of Highly Miffed". You know what *else* besides "cyberwar" is random, disorganized, mostly opportunistic drive-by's of targets doing no *real* damage and nobody takes public responsibility for? Graffiti. When we see a cyber-based attack that does as much *actual damage* as a military invasion, then we'll talk. Even something Panama or Grenada sized: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_invasion_of_Panama http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion_of_Grenada Till then, it's not cyber-war, it's cyber-graffiti.
pgptm89wtyvIo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
