On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:06:23 -0400 (EDT) der Mouse <mo...@rodents-montreal.org> wrote:
> >>> Why the BlackBerry in particular? > >> Perhaps because their entire operation is run as poorly as their > >> email system? > > So Obama is allowed to carry one, why, exactly? > > I'm reminded of a past workplace. They gave me a crackberry until I > made it clear I had no intention of reading my email on it, at which > point they reclaimed it and gave it to someone else. (Small loss; the > user interface would have driven me nuts to try to use to any > significant extent.) > > I would have expected giving one's login password to someone outside > the company would be a firing offense, but apparently it's OK when the > "someone" in question is RIM. I've never quite understood why. > > /~\ The ASCII Mouse > \ / Ribbon Campaign > X Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org > / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 > 4B _______________________________________________ Maybe the answer is something similar to or between the lines: "Change company, now!" Best regards, Henri Salo _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.