On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 6:26 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:51:00 +0200, Imri Goldberg said: > > No, the question is whether you want to bet the whole ball of wax on them > being able to do so. >
No. "yet another line of defense". A number of security experts have pointed out that the TSA as currently > set up is not good for much of anything except security theater. There may > indeed be a place for an organization charged with actually improving > transportation > safety, but the TSA isn't it, and if there *were* an organization, it > wouldn't > be "such as the TSA" - it would have to be an actual competent agency > charged > with actually improving security, which is an entirely different beast. > I agree, it would be nice for government agencies to be competent. :) Cheers, Imri -- Imri Goldberg -------------------------------------- http://plnnr.com/ - automatic trip planning http://www.algorithm.co.il/blogs/ -------------------------------------- -- insert signature here ----
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
