See also:

http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2011/1/29/4737705.html

- ferg

On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Shawn Merdinger <shawn...@gmail.com> wrote:

> http://opencrs.com/document/97-868/
>
> Summary
>
> Navigating the Internet requires using addresses and corresponding
> names that identify the location of individual computers. The Domain
> Name System (DNS) is the distributed set of databases residing in
> computers around the world that contain address numbers mapped to
> corresponding domain names, making it possible to send and receive
> messages and to access information from computers anywhere on the
> Internet. The DNS is managed and operated by a not-for-profit public
> benefit corporation called the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names
> and Numbers (ICANN). Because the Internet evolved from a network
> infrastructure created by the Department of Defense, the U.S.
> government originally owned and operated (primarily through private
> contractors) the key components of network architecture that enable
> the domain name system to function. A 1998 Memorandum of Understanding
> (MOU) between ICANN and the Department of Commerce (DOC) initiated a
> process intended to transition technical DNS coordination and
> management functions to a private-sector not-for-profit entity. While
> the DOC has played no role in the internal governance or day- to-day
> operations of the DNS, ICANN remained accountable to the U.S.
> government through the MOU, which was superseded in 2006 by a Joint
> Project Agreement (JPA). On September 30, 2009, the JPA between ICANN
> and DOC expired and was replaced by an Affirmation of Commitments
> (AoC), which provides for review panels to periodically assess ICANN
> processes and activities. Many of the technical, operational, and
> management decisions regarding the DNS can have significant impacts on
> Internet-related policy issues such as intellectual property, privacy,
> e- commerce, and cybersecurity. With the expiration of the ICANN-DOC
> Joint Project Agreement on September 30, 2009, and the announcement of
> the new AoC, the 112th Congress and the Administration may continue to
> assess the appropriate federal role with respect to ICANN and the DNS,
> and examine to what extent ICANN is positioned to ensure Internet
> stability and security, competition, private and bottom-up
> policymaking and coordination, and fair representation of the global
> Internet community. A related issue is whether the U.S. government's
> unique authority over the DNS root zone should continue indefinitely.
> Foreign governments have argued that it is inappropriate for the U.S.
> government to have exclusive authority over the worldwide DNS, and
> that technical coordination and management of the DNS should be
> accountable to international governmental entities. On the other hand,
> many U.S. officials argue that it is critical for the U.S. government
> to maintain authority over the DNS in order to guarantee the stability
> and security of the Internet. The expiration of the JPA, the
> implementation of the Affirmation of Commitments, and the continuing
> U.S. authority over the DNS root zone remain issues of interest to the
> 112th Congress, the Administration, foreign governments, and other
> Internet stakeholders worldwide. Other specific issues include the
> possible addition of new generic top-level domain names (gTLDs), .xxx
> and the protection of children on the Internet, the security and
> stability of the DNS, and the status of the WHOIS database. How all of
> these issues are ultimately addressed could have profound impacts on
> the continuing evolution of ICANN, the DNS, and the Internet.
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
>



-- 
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

Reply via email to