On Sat, 28 May 2011 12:00:48 +0300, Gadi Evron said: > On 5/28/11 1:14 AM, Chaim Rieger wrote: > > what says you ? > > > > or if its too far ot, let it die > > I think it doesn't matter whether it's speech or not, as it is in fact > published. There should be a legal definition somewhere.
And in 20 years, there will be. The tech field has gotten further ahead of the legal system to a greater degree than anytime since we invented tech and a legal system 5,000 years ago. That's why we have all these issues with intellectual property, privacy, and similar issues. Of course, in 20 years the fact we have a legal framework for how to consider today's Twitter won't matter. as both Twitter and the rest of the tech landscape will have mutated enough that some *other* yet unseen issue will be the big thing...
pgp5sJLW5zOdu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
