On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 01:33:07PM -0500, Ned Fleming wrote: > I could see Rich K starting a home for destitute (but reformed!) > spammers. Well . . . maybe not.
<chuckle> Given that I'm on the record as advocating the death penalty for spamming, this seems somewhat unlikely. But it's kind of a moot point: there are NO reformed spammers. (Oh, there are plenty who claim to be so, but closer examination inevitably reveals that they've merely been on hiatus and/or shifted tactics. The canonical example of this is Sanford Wallace.) ---rsk _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
