On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 16:50:39 PDT, "Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah" said:
> I wonder if some botherders, possibly not as good at math, converted some of > their networks? Who said anything about it being an either-or situation? If you got a botnet client on a machine that has a graphics card that supports CUDA, you can be doing a lot of Bitcoin mining during all those pesky 50-60ms RTTs you keep hitting on the network when trying to deliver spam. And even if you don't have CUDA, you should still be able to do a lot of computations if you don't care if the machine's owner wonders why the fan is on a lot. Probably want to avoid Bitcoin mining if the machine is running on battery power, that's kinda self-limiting. 15 years ago, I was managing to do well over 1M RCPT TO's a day on an IBM RS6K-220, which had a whole whopping 66Mhz PowerPC chip in it. And even with only 66Mhz pushing it, the big constraints were network latencies and timeouts and disk performance (do you know how many time Sendmail will end up invoking fsync() if you hit a timeout trying to reach a host? Lots.)
pgp9dL3ejfhEM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
