Haha, yeah. In all seriousness though, I would be all for it if the technical requirements were a moving target that follows industry best practice and competent security recommendations
Update the requirements yearly to be as strict as possible and give at most 1 year to be up to par. Won't be perfect, but if we .secure can force everyone to cut down their low hanging fruit once in a while, we'd have some step forward rather than the feel-good joke of a marketing gimmick it's likely to become. On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Ben April <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://www.darkreading.com/authentication/167901072/security/security-management/240000187/new-i-secure-i-internet-domain-on-tap.html > > If they really wanted to be secure they would require the > implementation of RFC 3514 > > -- > Benjamin D. April > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. >
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
