i used the search engine friendly urls on iRenovate.com and my listings only improved in a couple of the engines, it turned out to be quite a big pain in the ass programming wise, because all cflocations had to have absolute paths i.e. /products/index.cfm instead of just index.cfm and when a null value came up it would display // and the list functions in CF treat // as / which screwed things up all over the place, we tried to switch over to using "null" in our URLs, but that was pretty tough. Our stats engines didn't work, because it kept treating the cftokens as different directories, we couldn't seem to get the stats engines to ignore them. And lastly, it's in general a little bit harder to manage, because when you look at a long string, you have to figure out where the separation between variable and value is. On Fusebox.org we get 99% of our users from word of mouth, so i decided it wasn't worth the trouble. Steve Felix Huber wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > I just checked your Fusebox.org Source Code (thanks for it). > Now I have one question: > > Why no search-engine-friendly URLs? All your updated CustomTags (for > example the returnfuseaction.cfm) are coded for the old-style URLs ( > ?this=and&that=bla ). So I have serious problems to use your new CT with > my "Search-Engine" Links. Are you planning to release updated CTs or any > tips that you can give me? > > Greets, > Felix > > P.S.: Fusebox.org with "Search-Engine" Links would be the solution =) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
