Re: Documentation System for Cold Fusion

[John Foulds]

I haven't seen Fred's and am trying to find it, but we all know that
maintaining multiple syntaxes is as ugly as authoring for both IE and NN.

But I'm with you, I don't care which one as long as:

[1] there is a gestation period in firming up the syntax spec
[2] it is expandable
[3] it is parsable

John Foulds
Ottawa, Canada



----- Original Message -----
From: "John Quarto-vonTivadar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> What I'm trying to get a sense for is: can we all agree one type of the
> three that we could move forward with? I paraphrase Ben Franklin in saying
> that any of the three that we pick "may not be the best, but it is the
best
> we have".
>
> I vote for Fred's simply because it allows the maximum expansion, and is
> still readable by human eyes in its native format.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe visit 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox or send a 
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.