Fred, I like your approach. It is consistent with how I code, and I could
easily adopt it.
Also, standards are not evil. Consider Fusebox. And if you document
consistently to a standard, the benefits via a spidering parser are
tremendous.
Thanks John, for adding "++>, <++, and <+> seem to work too", that was lost
on me.
As a matter of fact, between your comments, Fred's example, and what I can
make out about FuseDoc - we're all on slightly different pages about it.
Hal, you mentioned that you posted the current Fusedoc standard a couple of
days ago. Do you mean the 15-line refresher and example? I can't find
anything anywhere else in here.
If there was an easily available specification or style guide of the
"standard", perhaps we might all be more in tune with each other.
Perhaps on www.fusedoc.com?
>Does anyone have any concrete suggestions for improvements?
Yeah, I'm working on it.
John Foulds
Ottawa, Canada
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
