Has no one else thought of this?
The big problem with clustered servers and query caching is that there is a
problem with it! But if we remove all qry_ and act_ files from the rest of
the cluster and only put them on one server (call it a query server) and map
#querymap# to that one server, then we can set application/server variables
to refresh the queries on that one server, which feeds the entire
application across the cluster. Is this cool? Is someone with a spare
cluster gonna try this?
Nat Papovich
ICQ 32676414
"If it was hard to write,"
says the Real Programmer,
"it should be hard to understand."
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 5:09 PM
To: Fusebox
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Using Mappings in a Cluster
At 07:38 PM 10/17/00 -0400, you wrote:
>The critical distinction I am making is using the CF Mapping to tell CF
>where the files are,
I'm using CF Mapping exclusively on a clustered app I'm developing, where
the CF templates are not in a directory that can be accessed by the web
server. The difference is that I'm storing templates on *each* server
rather than getting them from a central file server. (Synchronizing them
will not be a problem. As we host more websites we might go to a central
file server.)
>vs setting up a virtual directory in an IIS web site,
How do you avoid having at least one virtual directory for index.cfm?
I'm not sure I understand what you're doing.
best, paul
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox or
send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in
the body.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
