I wouldn't say there is anything detrital about it, it has just been
ammended for enhanced features and functionality. Most of it is the same.
-----Original Message-----
From: paul smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 9:17 PM
To: Fusebox
Subject: RE: Nesting circuits: I just don't get it! :(
Oh. So it's just detritus from Hal's standard format for index.cfm
best, paul
At 08:10 PM 3/28/01 -0500, you wrote:
>In an index.cfm file, if a fuseaction that CAN be handled by that circuit
is
>NOT handled by that circuit (in otherwords there is no cfcase statement to
>handle it, the default simply tells you that it received something it does
>not know how to handle. This forces you to make sure every fuseaction that
>is passed to a circuit is handled implicitly. Only during development
>should you get this error (or a tester who has some crazy ideas about how
to
>type in a URL).
>
>Mike Craig
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: paul smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 7:54 PM
>To: Fusebox
>Subject: RE: Nesting circuits: I just don't get it! :(
>
>
>Hal has the following in his simple Contact Manager app:
>
><!--- I'm going to get one (and only one) fuseaction at a time. Fuseactions
>correspond to methods or messages in OO languages. --->
> <cfswitch expression = "#attributes.fuseaction#">
>
> <cfdefaultcase>
> <cfoutput>
> I received a fuseaction called <B><FONT
>COLOR="000066">
>"#attributes.fuseaction#"</FONT></B> that I don't have
>a handler for.
> </cfoutput>
> </cfdefaultcase>
>
> </cfswitch>
>
>What do this do?
>
>best, paul
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
