Only problem is that "enobling" isn't a word :) Should that have been e-nobling? Or maybe ennobling... NAT > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > I am happy someone took the time to put into words what seemed painfully > obvious to me. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hal Helms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Now that's a wonderful, enobling idea applied to the political > arena ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
- Re: RIGID STANDARDISATION IN EXTENDED FUSEBOX Douglas Smith
- RE: RIGID STANDARDISATION IN EXTENDED FUSEBOX lee borkman
- RE: RIGID STANDARDISATION IN EXTENDED FUSEBOX Richmond, Alan
- RE: RIGID STANDARDISATION IN EXTENDED FUSEBOX Richmond, Alan
- RTFFW (was: RIGID STANDARDISATION...) Patrick McElhaney
- RE: RTFFW (was: RIGID STANDARDISATION...) Erik Voldengen
- RE: RTFFW (was: RIGID STANDARDISATION...) Brian Shearer
- RE: RTFFW (was: RIGID STANDARDISATION.... Hal Helms
- RE: RTFFW (was: RIGID STANDARDISA... Patrick McElhaney
- RE: RTFFW (was: RIGID STANDARDISA... Mike Craig
- RE: RTFFW (was: RIGID STANDAR... Nat Papovich
- RE: RTFFW (was: RIGID STANDAR... Ken Wilson
- RE: RTFFW (was: RIGID STANDAR... Hal Helms
- RE: RTFFW (was: RIGID STANDARDISATION.... Erik Voldengen
- RE: RTFFW (was: RIGID STANDARDISATION...) Roger B.
- RE: RTFFW (was: RIGID STANDARDISATION...) Patrick McElhaney
- RE: HEADER custom tag Ben Koshy
- RE: RIGID STANDARDISATION IN EXTENDED FUSEBOX McCollough, Alan
