Joseph -
If this is in response to my <cf_i>, <cf_a>, and <cf_o> (among other) tags,
just try them out yourself and see what I mean. Or you can ask Erik
Voldengen how he likes them.
NAT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joseph Higgins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 9:43 AM
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: Re: Cf_BodyContent and other functionalities!!
>
>
> I am sitting here asking myself . . . .why? Lets see you are adding a tag
> (more processing). The tag has an opening and a closing (the cfif already
> has an opening and a closing). And you do not have the ability to nest
> stuff. So what is your point?
>
> I came up with a new tag called <cf_kiss>.
> I place it around large blocks of code and it automatically simplifies it
> for me.
> In fact if I place this tag around your sample code like this:
>
> <cf_kiss>
> <CF_IF CONDITION="1 EQ 1">
> <CFOUTPUT>true!!!</CFOUTPUT>
> </CF_IF>
> <CF_IF CONDITION="1 EQ 2">
> <CFOUTPUT>false!!!</CFOUTPUT>
> </CF_IF>
> </cf_kiss>
>
> It outputs:
>
> <cfif 1 EQ 1>
> True!!!
> </cfif>
> <cfif 1 EQ 2>
> False!!!
> </cfif>
>
> Thats a kewl tag no doubt.
>
> I can't believe I spent the time writing that response. It must be my
> American sarcasm. I just do not see the point . . .
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
