Pseudocode for fusedocs now??? Kind of reminds me of the old thread
"FuseDoc Specification" from back in Aug of 2000 and that stupid joke piece
I did on PDL.
Fred
----- Original Message -----
From: "BORKMAN Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Fusebox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2001 10:29 PM
Subject: RE: Fusedocs Q
> Even easier, ie less like symbolic logic ;-) :
>
> ATTRIBUTES
> -->[personID]: the primary key of the person record
> IF (not(exists(personID)) {
> surname: the surname of the person in question
> zipCode: the person's zip-code
> }
>
>
> LeeBB
>
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE:
> This e-mail and any attachment to it is intended only to be read or used
by
> the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally
privileged
> information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
> mistaken transmission to you. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
> immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must
not
> disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended
> recipient. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to
> this e-mail or attachment to it.
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
