Oh absolutely, but its distilled down to its purest form.  Normal PDL is
almost like writing the application before  you write the application, from
the developers end it doesn't buy you very much, and causes grey hair and
bald spots.  Fusedoc's in their current state are direct enough to tell the
developer what to do and what to expect without telling them how to do it.
I think taking the fusedoc past that would be counter productive, and give
the designer more work and headaches than is necessary for a project to go
forward.

Fred

----- Original Message -----
From: "Hal Helms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Fusebox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 12:24 PM
Subject: RE: Fusedocs Q


> ***************************** Team Allaire *****************************
> Well, Fusedoc has always had the idea of being a lightweight PDL (program
> definition language). That's one of the reasons for the Responsibilities
> section.
>



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to