Sorry Ivan! We were having a little fun, imagining a scary world where
Fusebox is carefully documented, adherence is difficult to achieve, and a
bureaucratic nightmare controls the development of Fusebox. There is no such
standard, nor any revisions. The best place for information is the Fusebox
book, this list, and fusebox.org.
BTW - switch over to [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is being deprecated.
NAT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ivan Rodriguez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 3:30 AM
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: Re: Nesting cf_bodycontent
>
>
> Where are these Revisions????????
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hal Helms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Fusebox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 8:28 AM
> Subject: RE: Nesting cf_bodycontent
>
>
> > Nat, did you not get Revision 2.0.4.44.5a-11, which expressly prohibits
> > forbidden actions from being performed? (This included the Manichean
> > contingent's objections which were clearly overruled.)
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nat Papovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 8:24 PM
> > To: Fusebox
> > Subject: RE: Nesting cf_bodycontent
> >
> >
> > According to section 102, paragraph 3 of the "Revised Standards and
> > Practices of Fusebox Version 2.0.4.44.5" it is allowed.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Roger B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 3:14 PM
> > > To: Fusebox
> > > Subject: RE: Nesting cf_bodycontent
> > >
> > >
> > > > Can I confirm it's okay to nest cf_bodycontent...
> > >
> > > Gary,
> > >
> > > If by "it's okay" you mean "it works", yeah, definitely.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Roger
> > >
> > >
> >
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
