I hear ya, Tim.  I'll move this puppy over to the community forum.

Timothy Heald wrote:
> It's on topic for the NEO Forums people :)
> 
> Tim Heald
> ACP/CCFD :)
> Application Development
> www.schoollink.net
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brian Kotek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:57 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: MVC Pattern
> >
> >
> > Yes I have.  Why, is there something there that helps with the MVC
> > pattern?  (hopefully this is on-topic enough ;-)
> >
> > Stacy Young wrote:
> > >
> > > Have you had a chance to get on the Neo Beta program?
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Brian Kotek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:44 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: MVC Pattern
> > >
> > > Thanks Stacy.  Yeah, I tried Request too, I was just hoping to get away
> > > from "request.query.field", but since everything is called as a
> > module I
> > >
> > > think there is no way around it.  Its not a big deal, just
> > something you
> > >
> > > sort of need to know up front so you can plan for it.
> > >
> > > Regarding the directory layout of the MVC circuits, I agree
> > that keeping
> > >
> > > each circuit as a separate MVC 'unit' seems to make sense to me, but
> > > I'll see what Hal or the others think about that.  Maybe there is a
> > > reason for keeping them all under one MVC directory and I just don't
> > > know what it is yet.  ;-)
> > >
> > > Stacy Young wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hey Brian, good point man. (on the folder arrangement)...as for the
> > > > queries,
> > > > have you tried setting them to request scope?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Brian Kotek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:34 PM
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: MVC Pattern
> > > >
> > > > Hal (or anyone else who might know),
> > > >
> > > > I was playing with the MVC pattern again last night and created some
> > > > nice little shopping cart and product list circuits that use MVC.  I
> > > > have two questions:
> > > >
> > > > First, when breaking these down into Model, View, and Controller
> > > > circuits, is it better to do this:
> > > >
> > > > parent
> > > >     model
> > > >         cart
> > > >         products
> > > >     view
> > > >         cart
> > > >         procucts
> > > >     controller
> > > >         cart
> > > >         products
> > > >
> > > > or this:
> > > >
> > > > parent
> > > >      mvccart
> > > >         model
> > > >         view
> > > >         controller
> > > >      mvcproducts
> > > >         model
> > > >         view
> > > >         controller
> > > >
> > > > it seems to me the second one would make it easier to 'drag and drop'
> > > > these mvc components because each is self contained.
> > > >
> > > > My second question is, did anyone ever find a way around having to
> > > > reference queries and result sets using "caller.myquery" and in the
> > > > output using "caller.myquery.productid"?  Or is this just a
> > side effect
> > > > of the MVC setup and it must be that way?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Brian
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> >
> >
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> 
> 



---

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to