|
Hmm, maybe I have misunderstood the thrust of what you are
saying here, Steve.
Are you saying that whatever the security model used, be it Groups or Permissions or Colour or Crede, the "beautiful" thing about Hal's model is that each fuse merely expects two binary numbers:
It doesn't matter what these properties represent - they
could be atomic permissions or rich group memberships, the fuse doesn't
care. It just compares the requiredProperty with the userProperties
(BitAnd), and hey presto, we have our answer.
Now that. I admit, is cool. Is that what we were arguing about all along? I hope not. ;-) LeeBB ----- Original Message -----
==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================ |
- RE: secure tag and permissions hal helms
- Re: secure tag and permissions Lee Borkman
- Re: secure tag and permissions Steve Nelson
- RE: secure tag and permissions Tim Heald
- RE: secure tag and permissions hal helms
- Re: secure tag and permissions Steve Nelson
- Re: secure tag and permissions David Huyck
- Re: secure tag and permissions Lee Borkman
- Re: secure tag and permissions Steve Nelson
- Re: secure tag and permissions Lee Borkman
- Re: secure tag and permissions Lee Borkman
- Re: secure tag and permissions Steve Nelson
- RE: secure tag and permissions John Farrar
- RE: secure tag and permissions Alan McCollough
- RE: secure tag and permissions Cantrell, Adam
- RE: secure tag and permissions Stacy Young
- RE: secure tag and permissions pmcelhaney
- RE: secure tag and permissions Roger B.
- RE: secure tag and permissions hal helms
- Re: secure tag and permissions John Farrar
- Re: secure tag and permissions Lee Borkman
