John,

The acceptance of the votes does not prevent the publication of the votes. The votes 
should be posted... if not the count the order of selection. Who was the top 
candidate... and so. This is considered standard practice even in hostile regions of 
the world. We do not need acceptance to post the votes... and it seems like the points 
should be posted also. This information should be public.

I agree that they have to accept the position... but it still seems a suspect when the 
votes are not publicized... not just the accepted positions. I know there are lot's of 
good people in the world... but a good name is best protected by being transparent. 
PUBLISH THE VOTING RESULTS! Let the acceptance follow!

John

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/07/02 08:46AM >>>
It's taking so long because the council are emailing all those that have
been voted on asking them whether or not they are prepared to accept the
position for the forth coming year. Obviously with other people nominating
other people the person nominated and voted on may not wish to hold the
position.

Once the 13 positions have been filled then I'm sure the results will be
publicised.

John.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Farrar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: 07 May 2002 13:26
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Subject: Voting Records
> 
> 
> ** High Priority **
> 
> Come on now! What is taking so long? I asked extensive 
> questions about the results standards in advance. This is 
> what I was told...
> 
> Vote Points
> 01          13
> 02          12
> 03          11
> 04          10
> 05          09
> 06          08
> 07          07
> 08          06
> 09          05
> 10          04
> 11          03
> 12          02
> 13          01
> 
> You should be able to write queries that call queries to make 
> this easy if needed. 1. If vote greater than 0 points equals 
> 14 minus vote 2. Tally votes by person
> 
> There are other steps needed if there is special data 
> structure... but come on... ask for help if you need it... 
> don't put up a vote and then not run the vote!
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> John Farrar
> 
> 
> 
> _____________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by UUNET 
> delivered 
> through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further 
> information visit http://www.uk.uu.net/products/security/virus/ 
> 

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by UUNET delivered 
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.uk.uu.net/products/security/virus/ 

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to